EMIC Working Group of PMENA

← All references

Enactivism and ethnomethodological conversation analysis as tools for expanding Universal Design for Learning: the case of visually impaired mathematics students

Abrahamson, Dor; Flood, Virginia J.; Miele, Joshua A.; Siu, Yue-Ting

2018

OpenAlex ↗DOI

Keywords

Universal Design for Learningenactivismethnomethodological conversation analysisvisually impaired studentsblind studentstactile diagramsinclusive mathematics educationcooperative learningjoint manipulationproportioninclusive classrooms

Concepts

EnactivismUniversal Design for LearningConversationMultimodalityPraxisMathematics educationMathematical practiceUsabilityComputer scienceEmbodied cognitionCognitive scienceHuman–computer interactionPsychologyEpistemologyArtificial intelligenceCommunicationWorld Wide WebPhilosophyAutopoiesis

Citation

Abrahamson, D, Flood, V J, Miele, J A, Siu, Y.-T (2019). Enactivism and ethnomethodological conversation analysis as tools for expanding Universal Design for Learning: The case of visually impaired mathematics students. ZDM Mathematics Education, 291--303 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0998-1

Metadata

Source
ZDM
Domain
Social Sciences
Field
Social Sciences
Subfield
Education
Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Open access
NOT Open Access
Citation count
54
Work ID
W2890039170